Hi all,
As you have certainly noticed, more and more QSL managers request direct QSL through different ways : IRC / GS / OQRS. The question is to know how do you spend your GS ?
Ham radio is becoming business-oriented, involving sometimes huge things to go on some very difficult DX areas, like small Pacific islands, Antarctica/sub-antarctican Dx's, etc. Renting
boats/helicopters, freighting the equipment etc. A few famous expeidtions could be named therer : 3Y0, K5D, BS7H, TX5C on Clipperton, etc....
I do understand that some small contributions do help in setting up such expeditions, and agree on playing the rules. But only when I think it's worth it.
Now, everybody may have its own choice criteria to decide whether or not he'll send a direct QSL. But I've noticed after some years of activities on the air that I send less and less direct QSL's,
despite the opposite phenomenom of QSL managers. This costs a lot if you send a direct QSL for each band/mode new DX....!!!!!!!!!!!
My own criteria are as following
- All time new One --> Direct QSL (This happens very rarely to me, now approaching the 300 DXCC worked...latest one being ZK2V)
- New one on some bands
- Well, here, it depends...Main distinction criterion being "expedition" or "resident" in this QTH
If he is a resident, then I wait to get him on a few bands (minimum 3) before sending him the QSL. That was the case for example with TL0A (5 bands) or UK9AA (80/40/17m) for example. This can take
some time, but it is a more economical approach !
If this is an special expedition, I apply to do the same technic and focus on the bands I'm missing it. After, I choose to send direct QSL or not based on some additional criterai
- Is it a difficult DXCC for us? (meaning very rarely heard on the air, but already confirmed on some bands) --> direct QSL (E44M on 80/40/20/17/15m)
Other criteria of choices are:
- Is it a new zone on that band ? If yes, direct QSL (Latest one being RZ9OO (zone 18) on 10m.
- Is it my last band to complete this DXCC on all bands --> direct QSL (example: TK9X on 80m)
- Is it a very rare IOTA (such as NA189 recently, Most Wanted IOTA in North America) --> direct QSL.
- Is it a difficult one on that particular band (mostly 80/40m and 12/10m)? --> direct QSL. (For example, KH2JU on 40m, or VQ9RD on 80m)
For all the rest, I use Buro. For example, I QSo'd with 3DA0EL yesterday evening on 40m. I already have it confirmed there (just need it on 80m !)..So I'll send a QSL request via buro, even if it
is rarely heard on 40m.
All in all, I do spend about 20 US$ a month (average over the last year) for direct QLS'ing. that's not too much, and I coudl use Buro for all of them. But what would be the return rate of those
buro QSL? And how long should I wait before receiving their answer, if I receive them?
I calculated over the years 2003-2004-2005 years about 60% of positive return rate through buro.
Direct QLS'ing return rate is of course higher, but sometimes, I need to send some emails to remind the manager (or the resident) that I'm still expecting his answer.
Needless to say that some of them don't answer, and I'll make a black list of QSL'ers very soon. Top of them will be T77NM (80m QSO, my last band).
I sent him 2 emails before receiving a first answer, saying that he had "postal" problems and that some QSL were lost. So he asked me to re-send direct letter and he would reply me immediately.
That was 4 months ago, and I'm still waiting any answer (QSL for example) to the emails I sent him after sending my 2nd letter.
That's life !
Ronan, F8AFC